Alan E. Mann, AG
alan.familyhistory@gmail.com Accredited
Genealogist
Salt Lake Institute of Genealogy January
2006
Power Tools for Internet Genealogy
Documenting Your Internet
Findings
It has always been important
to document your research findings and cite your sources. Genealogy continues
to improve the methods for documentation and to encourage all to cite their
sources. In the past five years, it has become commonplace to find information
on the Internet. This has brought a new light on an old concern—how do I
document what I find on the Internet? How do I cite the source?
Documentation and citation of
sources go hand in hand. Documentation is recording how conclusions were
reached and showing evidence to support those conclusions. Citation is
recording the specific sources and showing how, if possible, to get back to the
source. Information on the web is constantly expanding, changing, and even
disappearing. How can one cite an Internet source?
It is important to review
existing guidelines which introduce many of the basic issues and give a
framework for the discussion of documentation and citation. First, take a look at the National
Genealogical Society standards page at www.ngsgenealogy.org/comstandards.cfm. There are links to
several separate sets of standards on specific topics. In this case, several
apply.
Once
the pertinent details are obtained from the NGS web pages, you should obtain
and read Elizabeth Shown Mills’ Evidence! Citation and Analysis
for the Family Historian. There, she presents and discusses 13
Guidelines for Documentation, followed by 13 Guidelines for Analyzing Evidence.
Guidelines for Documentation
1.
Any statement of
fact that is not common knowledge must carry its own individual statement of
source.
a.
to record the
specific location of each
piece of data, and
b.
to record details that affect the use or evaluation of that data.
7.
Explicit source
notes should also appear on ancestor charts and family group sheets.
9.
We should not
cite sources we have not used; it is both risky and unethical to "borrow
notes" from other writers.
10. Even a full citation of source may not be sufficient,
legally or ethically, when copying from another work.
Source of 13 Guidelines for
Documentation:
Mills, Elizabeth Shown. Evidence! Citation and
Analysis for the Family Historian.
Guidelines for Analyzing Evidence
1.
Direct evidence
is easier to understand, but indirect evidence can carry equal weight.
2.
Reliable
genealogical conclusions are based on the weight—not quantity—of the evidence
found.
3.
Evidence should
be drawn from a variety of independently created sources.
4.
Original source
material generally is more reliable than derivative material.
5.
The reliability
of a derivative work is influenced by the degree of processing it has undergone.
6.
The purpose of a
record and the motivation of its creators frequently affect its truthfulness.
7.
The most reliable informants have firsthand knowledge of the events to which they testify.
8.
The veracity and
skill of a record's creator will have shaped its content.
9.
Timeliness
generally adds to a document's credibility.
10. Penmanship can establish identity,
date, and authenticity.
11. A record's custodial history affects
its trustworthiness.
12. All known records should be used and a thorough effort made to identify unknown materials.
13. The case is never closed on a genealogical conclusion.
Source of 13
Guidelines for Analyzing Evidence:
Mills,
Elizabeth Shown. Evidence! Citation and Analysis for the Family Historian.
Documentation and Citation Principles
It is important
to record reasoning along with sources. It is not necessary to record all
sources if one single source is conclusive, but it may be desirable to cite
additional sources to account for the absence of contradiction or to deal with
any contradiction other records might present. You may want to cite/document
derivative works (compiled sources) which reached invalid conclusions or relied
on inaccurate data.
It is critical to
record the progress of research, sources consulted, reasoning considered,
conclusions reached, and specific findings. A research log or another method
which accomplishes these purposes should be used.
A good way to
document is to include an image or copy of the original. It does NOT replace
the need to cite the source nor for any subsequent researcher to consult the
source, but lends credibility and often alleviates concerns over
misinterpretation.
When citing something
found on the Internet, it is a good idea to document the creator (author) of
the web site as well as the URL. Use home page, site searching, root checking,
email, or familiarity with page/site structure to determine its origin. I
recommend saving a copy of the page since web pages are not usually stable
(File-Save as web page). This requires consideration of a naming and filing
system for web pages. Refer to the file name and location in your
documentation! Use copy and paste.
Sample research log (form is usually two
sided).
|
|
©Copyright 2006 by Alan E. Mann,
AG. All rights reserved. Written permission to reproduce all or part of
this syllabus material in any format, including photocopying, data retrieval or
the Internet, must be secured in advance from the copyright holder. Lists of 13
guidelines used by permission.